10
Dec
Dec
“Health Food” vs. Healthy Food — How to read labels
Do you know how to read food labels? Maybe you THOUGHT you did. Truth is, you probably don’t. But Jeff Novick, MS, RD — of the McDougall program — does. And in his full talk he shows the 3 easy steps you MUST know if you ever buy foods at any supermarket or “health” food store. In this online excerpt, Novick — who used to be a food service manager at Kraft Foods — exposes one of the dirty secrets major food corporations use to deceive consumers. It’s no accident labels are so confusing …
|
If you have trouble seeing the images below, click here. |
|
|
December 10th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
thewealthsecret . org
Make £100 per hour from home
100% Free
You will start earning within 7 minutes from this point if you visit thewealthsecret . org now
See how to do it 100% free! Works from any county
December 10th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
to it has at least 40% calories coming from fat. this would be considered unhealthy by these standards ofcourse. I am sure that this particular product is junk, but its not because of the evil fat.
December 10th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
I would assume that health conscious people also eat pasta, vegetables and fruit, drink milk and so on. this calorie hunt is just a food related induced schizophrenia. these particular statements are misleading at best. You could have a product easily match 70% carbohydrates by adding sugar to it. it doesnt mean its healthy. Ofcourse, you dont want to eat too much fat, but this is a quite flexible and individual requirement. This guy is playing on peoples ignorance. Any soup with any taste
December 10th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
the info IS accurate. if u see, which is stated on the label, that there is not a whole lot of carbohydrates and proteins in a product (which is the case in this particular calorie distribution), it is easy to put that into perspective with the amount of fat in it (it is both measured in mass) and get all the info you need. and there is nothing wrong with a lot of your calories coming from fat, especially not if it is one product.
December 10th, 2009 at 9:09 pm
“the rest of the product doesn’t contain much calories”…
Thats the point. We eat to get calories (and micronutrients, etc). If we need a certain number of calories to live, and we dont want a high percentage of those to come from fat, then we need accurate information on our labels.
December 10th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Settle down, dinkolino2, I’m pretty sure he’s making the point that every health recommendation (from every health authority in the world) refers to fat as a percentage of total calories. So, for a company to call something 99% fat free, when in fact most of its calories are from fat is misleading to those who are trying to be health conscious.
Again, the health conscious person, trying to reduce the number of calories from fat, would be misled by this label. I’m sure that’s all he’s saying.
December 10th, 2009 at 10:45 pm
if this lecture shows anything it is not that there is to much fat in a product, rather that the rest of the product doesnt contain much calories. He is right about that, but then twists it to make a nonpoint.. if they put 50% sugar in it then percentage calories from fat would go down rapidly.. would that be better?
December 10th, 2009 at 11:38 pm
he is outright lying. if you have 1% fat it naturaly and logicaly means that it applies to mass. Since fat is very caloric ofcourse more than 1% of total calories come from fat. 67% calories from fat just means that the rest of ingredients have almost no nutritional value. if u had a bucket of water and a spoon of sugar in it, 100% calories would come from sugar. This ofcourse doesnt mean that the bucket of water is 100% sugar. The public listening to this fraud are morons
December 11th, 2009 at 12:31 am
fat is not bad for you. there are many different fats anyway, its like saying carbohydrates are bad for you. or proteins.. some poisons are proteins..
December 11th, 2009 at 12:45 am
I know this seems like a joke, but I was really asking: What about organic poison berries?
If we concede that nature is capable of producing food that is unequivocally BAD for us, then that admission must apply across the board. Meat may be simply BAD for us; it has little to do with how it is processed.
December 11th, 2009 at 1:10 am
I’m sorry, but I seem to have missed this thread. Why do we want “colloidal silver”?
December 11th, 2009 at 1:32 am
How about organic poison berries?
December 11th, 2009 at 2:24 am
I don’t believe in meat eating or vegetarianism completely. What matters is to stay away from any man-made food and only eat natural food. You can never go wrong with that. Try to choose natural organic food if you can. Organic grass-fed beef is one of the best meat you can get.
December 11th, 2009 at 3:06 am
its much better for you then flouride,mercury,barium thats in tap water :O))
December 11th, 2009 at 3:29 am
Yeah that is absolutely true.
December 11th, 2009 at 4:04 am
just letting you guys know that are ingesting colloidal silver it can cause permanent discoloration of the skin blue or grey. Its called Argyria. There is no cure for it and it can lead to other serious ailments. Your basically just exposing your innards to a harmful chemical that is all. So be careful and stay healthy.
December 11th, 2009 at 4:34 am
“The beef industry has contributed to more American deaths than all the wars of this century, all natural disasters, and all automobile accidents combined. If beef is your idea of “real food for real people” you’d better live real close to a real good hospital.” ~Neal Barnard
Please watch EARTHLINGS – i have a playlist on my page”
December 11th, 2009 at 5:01 am
I went to your website for colloidal silver. It is selling CS at 10 ppm (parts per million). Higher counts cost more.
The CS I buy from “Innovative Natural Products” is 1100 ppm. Quite a difference! Mine takes very little (1/4 eyedropperful) to be kick-@ss effective.
December 11th, 2009 at 5:41 am
There is a good place to get Colloidal Silver Wholesale at SacredColloidalSilver(.)com They have 1 Gallon for only $99.99. The product is awesome and is getting great reviews. They don’t use any salts or proteins just pure silver and pure water.
December 11th, 2009 at 5:53 am
marvelous description
December 11th, 2009 at 6:24 am
THANKYOU. I was wondering where the rational people were. I think the thumbs-downers bolted once they saw numbers involved.
December 11th, 2009 at 6:42 am
Did anyone who voted down this comment actually CHECK THE MATH before doing so?!
Anywho, you’re right. Maybe it’s just an accident, but that part of the video is wrong.
December 11th, 2009 at 7:02 am
Not only a second, but a third and fourth; I’m not stupid nor was I speaking to you.
December 11th, 2009 at 7:37 am
Yea, and I’m sure you speak a second language at all?
December 11th, 2009 at 8:29 am
You should go back to grade school to learn how to spell CARBOHYDRATES and the fact that it is one fucking word!